From 9ecd296bc1f93b4754d0bea3553e77c49676711a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joe Rayhawk Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:47:16 -0800 Subject: notes: intellectual maladaption: Fixing links --- notes/intellectual_maladaptation.mdwn | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/notes/intellectual_maladaptation.mdwn b/notes/intellectual_maladaptation.mdwn index 5ce3848..3c62037 100644 --- a/notes/intellectual_maladaptation.mdwn +++ b/notes/intellectual_maladaptation.mdwn @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ The intellectual framework is fairly simple: ### Set 1: -* Internalized (See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internalization ) +* Internalized (See: ) * Good * Optimal * Valuable @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ be a paradox, so, we get choices. Actually *killing* Tom would typically require even more discomfort, so this would settle to mere extremely overt hostility unless more uncomfortable circumstances force the situation - (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Reiser ) + (e.g. ) * C. Both motivations are bad/worthless/nonexistent. This position has the property of requiring more intellectual @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ employed: 3. Adopting consistent and unassailable values and motivations from which to legitimately justify the position that all externalized entities are worthless before they are even enumerated. - (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivism_(Ayn_Rand) ) + (e.g. >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivism_(Ayn_Rand)> ) 4. Attracting like-minded maladapted people, eager to share values and motivations. 5. Alienating non-maladapted people before their values and motivations -- cgit v1.2.3