From f7afd949c9e2cc4c5f199e3db6398d1be7fcfea9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joe Rayhawk Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:29:59 -0800 Subject: Notes: lockfiles: Clarifying criticisms of pure shell approach --- notes/lockfiles.mdwn | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'notes') diff --git a/notes/lockfiles.mdwn b/notes/lockfiles.mdwn index 7db4ad8..39eecda 100644 --- a/notes/lockfiles.mdwn +++ b/notes/lockfiles.mdwn @@ -3,8 +3,9 @@ ## Random example shell scripts out on the web All locks need a read/compare/delete/write transaction that is not practical -with the shell alone. Imagine a `sleep` statement in front of the -`rm stalelock` operation and what that would do to other processes. +with the shell alone. Imagine a `sleep` statement in front of or inbetween the +`mv lock stalelock` `unlink stalelock` `write lock` operations and what that +would do to other processes. Process name comparison won't work very well as scripts aren't always executed under their own name or even as their own process. For example, -- cgit v1.2.3