diff options
author | fuzzyTew <fuzzyTew@gmail.com> | 2019-10-16 16:56:01 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2019-10-16 16:56:01 -0400 |
commit | 9b0b40bfd12a7a5a941dc64e6f04af0237a550f3 (patch) | |
tree | 614dfdc51454cd3c97b1fb181a03968165db1771 /README.md | |
parent | 7da8cc5684cd56616a7578756d40523973a608c9 (diff) | |
download | standingwithresilience-9b0b40bfd12a7a5a941dc64e6f04af0237a550f3.tar.gz standingwithresilience-9b0b40bfd12a7a5a941dc64e6f04af0237a550f3.zip |
Create README.md
Diffstat (limited to 'README.md')
-rw-r--r-- | README.md | 31 |
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1a72de1 --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +# bagel +well really it's a little hobby sentient-AI idea, but it's too small to do or be anything + +# relevence +The idea is kind of that our minds have a very fancy network of nearness and farness of concepts. +When I think about something -- brainstorm on it -- my mind activates it and it activates relevent associated thoughts. +It pours through different thoughts that are nearby by association, and keeps the ones that are more useful, more relevent, while +discarding the ones that aren't. + +# self-reference +Additionally, my mind when working on a task, can improve the actual process of working on the task. The steps can change. +The process for finding steps can change. The whole goal can change. I can even go out and wonder why I am working the task +in the first place, and think about that. Then I can act on the new decision. +By making code that writes itself, we move towards an intellect that can learn and improve. + +# implementation ideas +I wrote out some quick relevence around how I might write code, and it seemed like the 'why' for each step was basically a small +chunk of code itself. It seems like there are relevent concepts in my mind that are roughly linked to these small behaviors +(habits or chunks of code). By making such links in actual code, the code looks more mindlike to me. +One of the keys is to get the code to make the links itself, and I think what is important there is the concept of patterns-that- +work. If you can discern when code works, then you can look for similar properties on the before and end states. If some of them +are always the same when it works, those are probably the ones that should be linked to the code chunk under study. This provides +for rudimentary learning. + +# size +This code is written very tiny so that little work need be invested in it for it have conceptual growth. The idea and hope somehow +is that it move rapidly towards coding itself, such that as it gets coded, the developer need do less to work on it, being able to +instead make use of its internal functions for producing code-like behavior. + +# etc +There is of course more. This writing content was made day-of-creation. Will I ever edit this again? Unknown. |