summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/README.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorfuzzyTew <fuzzyTew@gmail.com>2019-10-16 16:56:01 -0400
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2019-10-16 16:56:01 -0400
commit9b0b40bfd12a7a5a941dc64e6f04af0237a550f3 (patch)
tree614dfdc51454cd3c97b1fb181a03968165db1771 /README.md
parent7da8cc5684cd56616a7578756d40523973a608c9 (diff)
downloadstandingwithresilience-9b0b40bfd12a7a5a941dc64e6f04af0237a550f3.tar.gz
standingwithresilience-9b0b40bfd12a7a5a941dc64e6f04af0237a550f3.zip
Create README.md
Diffstat (limited to 'README.md')
-rw-r--r--README.md31
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1a72de1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# bagel
+well really it's a little hobby sentient-AI idea, but it's too small to do or be anything
+
+# relevence
+The idea is kind of that our minds have a very fancy network of nearness and farness of concepts.
+When I think about something -- brainstorm on it -- my mind activates it and it activates relevent associated thoughts.
+It pours through different thoughts that are nearby by association, and keeps the ones that are more useful, more relevent, while
+discarding the ones that aren't.
+
+# self-reference
+Additionally, my mind when working on a task, can improve the actual process of working on the task. The steps can change.
+The process for finding steps can change. The whole goal can change. I can even go out and wonder why I am working the task
+in the first place, and think about that. Then I can act on the new decision.
+By making code that writes itself, we move towards an intellect that can learn and improve.
+
+# implementation ideas
+I wrote out some quick relevence around how I might write code, and it seemed like the 'why' for each step was basically a small
+chunk of code itself. It seems like there are relevent concepts in my mind that are roughly linked to these small behaviors
+(habits or chunks of code). By making such links in actual code, the code looks more mindlike to me.
+One of the keys is to get the code to make the links itself, and I think what is important there is the concept of patterns-that-
+work. If you can discern when code works, then you can look for similar properties on the before and end states. If some of them
+are always the same when it works, those are probably the ones that should be linked to the code chunk under study. This provides
+for rudimentary learning.
+
+# size
+This code is written very tiny so that little work need be invested in it for it have conceptual growth. The idea and hope somehow
+is that it move rapidly towards coding itself, such that as it gets coded, the developer need do less to work on it, being able to
+instead make use of its internal functions for producing code-like behavior.
+
+# etc
+There is of course more. This writing content was made day-of-creation. Will I ever edit this again? Unknown.