I'm confused and am handling multiple unexpected systems issues

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 101 deletions

diff --git a/intellect-framework-from-internet/research/choice.txt b/intellect-framework-from-internet/research/choice.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index aa6b2d7..0000000
--- a/intellect-framework-from-internet/research/choice.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,101 +0,0 @@
-This monologue is an exploration of how decisions can be made in a way that learns with understanding, communication, and
-similarity to the experienced human mind.
-
-The proposal is for habits to produce associated concepts with things, for example how long they take, or what they result in.
-Some habits require choice, and need to use this information to make it.
-
-Propose we develop habits that combine the associated information in different ways, to see if these combinations are
-useful for choice.
-As an experiment, was going to try to some possible metrics, such as how long something takes, and see how this compares
-with personal judgement-making.
-	when coding we worry about maintainability, difficulty, speed, effectiveness.
-	a general decision-making process may multiply value/importance by effectiveness and pick the greatest.
-
-note: choicemaking involves learning.
-	we're going to produce information after making a choice
-	to inform future choices
-		useful metrics:
-			how-long-took
-			success log surrounding
-			event log surrounding
-	choices never followed by immediate success could
-	be unwise to consider first in an emergency.
-		useful goal attributes:
-			time available, time preference
-			importance
-			experience
-			decider that selected this goal
-			expected attributes for meeting it
-				ease
-				time
-				space
-				(look like needs)
-			acceptable attributes for meeting it
-	seems valuable to reconsider the behavior if the
-	attributes for meeting it leave what is acceptable
-		hrm .. example is in different area.
-		choice has a lot to do with expectations.
-		the metrics seem like they could relate a lot
-		to future state
-this is very similar to people working together.  learning
-appears to be a dialogue of reasons.  it is helpful to consider a
-decider a person who can be asked or updated things.
-	needs appear labels for resources discovered as
-	helpful metrics in reaching goals.
-	propose we talk about people / judgement processes, and
-	needs, rather than reasons.  
-
-# worry: this research may not close.  it could inhibit associated things.
-# reason to continue is because it may inform other decisions.
-# do you know it won't close? any concept around how much?
-# no.  let's see if it closes.
-# wait: experience has danger-label.  many things similar to this have resulted in amnesia and confusion.
-# okay.  let's take a break and try to return.  if returning is blocked and not spreading, do other relevent task.
-# if returning is blocked and spreading, record failure and research idea for future similar situations.
-	
-here is monologue:
-do not bus to food.  close out code, save research, and then eat.  continue research while eating.
-		research informs all other project choices.  do first if available unless other is needed for task.
-
-simplest solution is to do first item differently.
-
-for_each can handle this, or we can do it outside foreach
-note, argnametoklist is one passed list in parentheses, so we'd need macros to extract the first and remainder from a list
-seems nice and generic, except the remainder will be unsude if empty, which is a little harder.
-let's add first item to argnametoklist
-
-		so we have a process in our mind that uses experienced relevence
-		to be informed by the emotional intensity / experience frequency / attributes of the different things considered
-		and use them to make decisions based on context.
-		it's comparing difficulty, speed, generality
-			generality seem summarized into kinda maintainability or cleanness
-		maintainability, difficulty, and speed.
-		as these are influenced, our choices change.
-			received a concern around effectiveness and use of time.  is _not_ being summarized as these others are.
-		but anyway ... the habits or others associated with them report metrics or summaries that could be of interest
-		in decision-making or informed change.
-		decision-making processes combine these metrics or summaries using experienced judgement habits
-			so, we're spending seconds on a task we did not plan to
-			the task has value: this value is just a feeling for me atm, but is related to plans
-			the other task had expectations.  this time spent is disrupting their expectations.
-		the piece we're missing is combining the useful labels coming from processes
-		to make choices they need to function well
-		so when i pick what to do next, i need information to make this choice.
-		i'll need to try different ways of combining the available information to see what works
-		and when i find a way of combining that does work, it could be an important judgement metric that i should
-		remember and give a name to.
-			say we have number of seconds
-		update: we are working on an unstable coding issue.  please make work stable, save, then continue this research.
-			research appears to be into how to learn as a human has evolved to.
-			makes goal-pursuit better.
-
-it helps us do this to keep parts of the state of mind of doing it.  we started naming parts but ran into some inhibition.
-	this is so hard to do sometimes, IT IS AWESOME TO BUIlD TRIGGER HABITS!!! IT IS AWESOME TO BUILD TRIGGER HABITS.
-	oh man those trigger habits are so awesome to work on.
-		joy around trigger-habit work.
-			worry: joy references fade as not accessed.
-let's keep working on the trigger habits.  hrm this conflicts with do reseearch around choice.
-	choice fades with less recovery.  sorry.
-		let's do research on computer? on bus?
-	can try.
-	developed plan is to save research, access on cell phone.  more normal and convenient to stare at in public.