different list approach from othet device

1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp b/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp
index ee55b04..365653b 100644
--- a/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp
+++ b/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp
@@ -1185,3 +1185,34 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{
 
 	return 0;
 })();
+diff --git a/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp b/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp
+index ee55b04..09c7b64 100644
+@@ -1127,10 +94,13 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{
+ 
+ 		if (!happened.linked(whenever-list)) { return; }
+ 
+-		(until-each-list-item-context-in-list)(action-whenever-happened, ctx, happened.get(whenever-list));
++		ref stub = a(event);
++		stub.set(event, ev);
++
++		(until-each-list-item-context-in-list)(action-whenever-happened, stub, happened.get(whenever-list));
+ 	});
+ 
+-	ahabit(action-whenever-happened, ((list-item, li), (happened-context, hapctx)),
++	ahabit(action-whenever-happened, ((list-item, li), (event, h)),
+ 	{
+ 		// here: when we trigger a behavior, we want information associated with producing the trigger,
+ 		// as well as the event that triggered.  that's two contexts.
+@@ -1142,8 +112,11 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{
+ 		// take one context, which is the one prepared
+ 		// in the list, then we inject our context
+ 		// into that, inside a "happened" property.
++		ref actctx = i.get(action-context);
++
++		actctx.set(happened, h);
+ 
+-		i.get(action)(hapctx, i.get(action-context));
++		i.get(action).fun<ref>()(i.get(actctx));
+ 	});
+ 
+ 	ahabit(whenever-habit, ((happens, ev), (action, act), (action-context, actctx)),