diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp | 23 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp b/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp index 1b5054b..56c7ffa 100644 --- a/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp +++ b/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{ // constructors are tentatively abolished in the low-level habit language. (new-type-instance modifies, not creates) // we have one constructor of concepts, and knowledge attachment to concepts. - decl(make, know, concept, is, group, already, in); + decls(make, know, concept, is, group, already, in); ahabit(make-concept, (), { result = a(concept); @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{ // opencog has functions for pattern matching etc // they arent self-modifiable, may not matter - decls(ordered, behavior); + //decls(ordered, behavior); // need args and result for sequence //ahabit(habit-sequence, (( @@ -141,10 +141,11 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{ // list is mostly the [first-entry, last-entry, next, prev] structure // can be handled innumerable ways. // LIST STRUCTURE PROMISE - // should be a promise yandled by habits rather than - // a bunch of specific habits, but is ok for now + // should be a promise handled by habits? rather than + // a bunch of specific habits? but is ok for now // is likely good for mind to discover // promises and structures on its own + // but implementing them generally might speed dev up, dunno ahabit(know-is-list, ((list, l)), { result = l; @@ -202,7 +203,7 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{ prev.set(next, li); } }); - ahabit(each-list-entry, ((action, a), (context, c), (list, l)), + ahabit(list-each-entry, ((list, l), (context, c), (action, a)), { ref cur = l.get(first-item); while (cur != nothing && result == nothing) { @@ -210,13 +211,14 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{ cur = cur.get(next); } }); - ahabit(remove-from-list, ((item, i), (list, l)), + // list-entry-remove could be pulled out + ahabit(list-remove, ((list, l), (item, i)), { - result = (until-each-list-item-context-in-list)( + result = (list-each-entry)(l, i, ahabit(self-iter, ((list-item, i2), (remove-item, i)), { if (i2.get(item) == i) { - result = true + result = true; ref prev = i2.get(previous); ref n = i2.get(next); if (prev != nothing) { @@ -230,8 +232,7 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{ i2.unlink(item); dealloc(i2); // hmm. we do have an active goal of making memory allocation be habit based. this might work here, though. } - }), - i, l); + })); }); using links_it = level0::baseref::links_t::iterator; @@ -272,6 +273,7 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{ (populate-link-entry)(result); }); + /* ahabit(happened-habit, ((happened, ev)), { if (!happened.linked(whenever-list)) { return; } @@ -338,6 +340,7 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{ // a trigger on the habit-happening habit to check if a label is set, // and remove the habit if it is. }); + */ return 0; })(); |