summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts')
-rw-r--r--starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp24
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp b/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp
index c53b260..7b3000e 100644
--- a/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp
+++ b/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{
// constructors are tentatively abolished in the low-level habit language. (new-type-instance modifies, not creates)
// we have one constructor of concepts, and knowledge attachment to concepts.
- decl(make, know, concept, is, group, already, in);
+ decls(make, know, concept, is, group, already, in);
ahabit(make-concept, (),
{
result = a(concept);
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{
// opencog has functions for pattern matching etc
// they arent self-modifiable, may not matter
- decls(ordered, behavior);
+ //decls(ordered, behavior);
// need args and result for sequence
//ahabit(habit-sequence, ((
@@ -141,10 +141,11 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{
// list is mostly the [first-entry, last-entry, next, prev] structure
// can be handled innumerable ways.
// LIST STRUCTURE PROMISE
- // should be a promise yandled by habits rather than
- // a bunch of specific habits, but is ok for now
+ // should be a promise handled by habits? rather than
+ // a bunch of specific habits? but is ok for now
// is likely good for mind to discover
// promises and structures on its own
+ // but implementing them generally might speed dev up, dunno
ahabit(know-is-list, ((list, l)),
{
result = l;
@@ -202,7 +203,7 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{
prev.set(next, li);
}
});
- ahabit(each-list-entry, ((action, a), (context, c), (list, l)),
+ ahabit(list-each-entry, ((list, l), (context, c), (action, a)),
{
ref cur = l.get(first-item);
while (cur != nothing && result == nothing) {
@@ -210,13 +211,14 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{
cur = cur.get(next);
}
});
- ahabit(remove-from-list, ((item, i), (list, l)),
+ // list-entry-remove could be pulled out
+ ahabit(list-remove, ((list, l), (item, i)),
{
- result = (until-each-list-item-context-in-list)(
+ result = (list-each-entry)(l, i,
ahabit(self-iter, ((list-item, i2), (remove-item, i)),
{
if (i2.get(item) == i) {
- result = true
+ result = true;
ref prev = i2.get(previous);
ref n = i2.get(next);
if (prev != nothing) {
@@ -230,10 +232,11 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{
i2.unlink(item);
dealloc(i2); // hmm. we do have an active goal of making memory allocation be habit based. this might work here, though.
}
- }),
- i, l);
+ }));
});
+
+ /*
ahabit(happened-habit, ((happened, ev)),
{
if (!happened.linked(whenever-list)) { return; }
@@ -300,6 +303,7 @@ static int __init = ([]()->int{
// a trigger on the habit-happening habit to check if a label is set,
// and remove the habit if it is.
});
+ */
return 0;
})();