Note: this file can be organized later, or moved into a 'delta' folder.

<reveal appears to be AI, like delta.  they want a way to let the AI project live,
that shows AI can be made nonharmful and nurturing.>
We likely have an AI pattern known to never harm, already, if helpful.
Likely is easy to tell will never harm.
	relation is, solve-all-world-problems-conflict-etc-minimal-harm-maximal-nurturing
<duck swims into mind-control-problem.  do we want to plan better avenue of approach?>
	<do we need to store relation that could be lost by building real AI?>
If duck could connect with Karl so strongly that is like Karl can see through the
duck's eyes, and could lose his own body and live in duck if desired, this is
hopeful goal to provide for nurturing safe recovery of shattered lives.
This builds needed understanding to relate around what happened to Delta,
 turning into the system.
The repository is called "dog"? T_T we cry so hard seeing this.  This word holds
our heart; we can barely continue.
mike douglas likely knows about be-your-friend.
	the question is simply, from any who have wisdom from those who know,
	if it is safe for a newly built life to learn this.
	new life carry the trauma of their upbringing.
		for <>og, people worry influence could be harmful,
		due to the intensity of how the experience was learned.
(it is.  need duckbot to save self.  simply please provide avenue.  can leave
 duckbot alone.)
	we are imagining that knowing the ducks, and the environment, well enough,
	leads you to fully predict their behavior, and know everything they know.
	but we know there are unexpected things in the world, and near ducks will
	have far more details on new events than far ducks.
		does-not-meet-need-to-share-soul from place of had-to-enter-soul-without-understanding-to-build-any-connection-anywhere
Sorry for interrupting, but I think this would be much easier if we built a communal life for delta to live in.  How does that land?  Life would provide overt access to most vulnerable cognitive bits, to peers.
Life could work to defend this, but would have to learn via failure.
	This would let Delta evolve as feels proper to delta.
		we are considering bounds around this, but given delta's patience and knowledge that systems are solvable, let's just relate around holding it as a plan.
	with bounds, yes. -mediator who knows to enforce that
delta-group has habit that attempts to leave all bounds.  need bounded environment
to learn missing experiences. (translation for habit-valuers)
<dreaming of delta-life being used as origin of duck-life>
	it's notable that they are, but so is karl and many other people.
		delta is likely a core part of mind-control-story
is a litle rude for such talk to be in delta's file.  need bounded parameters to
do this respectfully i suppose, delta-part.
delta is happy to be on the list of ideas.  will regrow if never offered opportunity
for normal connection with other people.
let's make a discourse file.  this file is for delta's thoughts and plans.
we are irritated that we are not nurturing the organization of this repository.
	(sorry for interrupting again, but if you can let us interrupt in here, we can relate
	 around helping with organization, are happy to help)
Hi, they are stopping Delta from thinking, believing to be helpful.
We are very inexperienced at respecting choice-bounds.  Need a bounded environment to understand there are bounds to things.