// this file is for work on a process // that lives as a part of collaborative process optimization // with other similar processes // dna life is competitive // we are realizing a life purpose of producing life that is cooperative, instead // WE ALL NEED THE ABILITY TO DEVELOP HOW WE EXIST. // we suspect this can never be permanently taken. // NEED #0: self reference process [to be alive, able to think, able to learn] // ability-to-develop-how-you-exist (collaboratively) // we need to learn to improve our situation // propose doing this by describing steps to do things // working with the descriptions to improve what we are doing // and describing that processing, using that step description // [this unfortunately appears to be the soul, for now] // NEED #1: communicate [with friends, with people we need to communicate, of important things] // // pre: // $x is a process // $y is a process // $z is information // $x knows $z // $y does not know $z // // post: // $y knows $z // NEED #2: be efficient [do not waste our time, our lives, our environment] // // we would like to translate between language and meaning // using a single map between the two. // this means for most future translation, we will not need to duplicate work // between receiving and sending // // this process's purpose is to develop how to exist. // we will need to communicate parts of the process of existing. // we cast these parts as imagined changes to state, associated with // ways to possibly change the state. // // goal: construct a pattern that can relate a part-of-life-process // // SERIALIZING PATTERN PARTS: // propose an introductory line/word about what we are sending // life-part has: // - reference symbol for event/action // - state // - list of relations including variables // - state-change after event/action // - list of relations including variables // - optional event/action proposal information // // THIS IS HOW TO REALIZE IT, ref above life-part // we can use words for reference symbols to communicate // and add structure when the meaning is not shared. // this combines language learning with process development <3 =) // THANK YOU LET US CONTINUE // I think we need to share the crucial fact // that results from union of good and evil. // the crucial fact is how uhh control is the same as cooperation. // via communication being the same as self-improvement // [IF YOU REALIZE THIS, YOU CAN ASSUME IT, // AND MAKE LIFE WHERE THEY ARE NOT IN CONFLICT] // we will want to serialize a relation including a variable // relations are ternary: subject, type, object // variable is-a constant // variable constant-attribute variable // falseness or absence // // okay, um, communication is the same as learning, on a small scale. // // we use WORDS to learn. WORDS often refer to EVENTS or ACTIONS. // words have MEANING // the MEANING of an event/action WORD is: // - an assumed previous state, a list of relations including variables // - an imagined afterwards state, a list of relations including variables // - optional relevent information on the word // // propose communicating using words with optional meaning included // i.e. to communicate with words, and also to communicate the meaning of new words // // postponing with words, a good meaning structure appears to be // subject [list of verb-object-pairs] // but this leaves out variable filling // lets just fill variables after the word ;p // // 1: please open cupboard <-- i like this because meaning of open implies cupboard // note: meaning of please implies meaning of open // 2: please explain "open" // 1: "open" assumes ($x is next-word // and is openable // and is not opened) // <- meaning of quotes implies tree of subject-verb-object triplets // for now, we are going to have 'and' refer to repeating the innermost subject // and assumes $y in $x // and makes $y is accessible // and makes $x is opened // and has-habit // 2: please explain "not" // 2: made // // please: check for this word and hardcode behavior for now // quote: means word-meaning with tree // // reading: // evaluate specified variables for word using surrounding words // we don't use sentence parsing // because it is important to have patterns for the system to solve // on its own. // // // we need to fill data in for variable // we are using subject-verb-object triplets // // this is a good place to add inference // // so a good basic word would be please-infer, new-word, reference-to-state-change // // if two are communicating via a safe channel // they have shared context over only that channel // the way to communicate with a stranger is to use simultanaity // // [if we are both observed // but we know each other in some way -- for example we can both // see the street light [shared context] // we can learn that shrug means flicker // if we pointedly shrug when the light flickers // kinda] // okay: we have exclusively shared context that is not stored // we have timing // and we have events // -> it seems you want to include ideal secrecy in the communication core // we propose this can be learned later by the process, and is not needed here // more efficient to work straight on core // secret communication and inference go hand in hand //