diff options
| author | user <user@localhost.localdomain> | 2019-12-15 08:15:32 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | user <user@localhost.localdomain> | 2019-12-15 08:15:32 -0800 |
| commit | 3e65ec890f0bc9e9bec8ffd64e69ccf87ed6054e (patch) | |
| tree | 2ac06b9bd902fd2a90310407f2fa2702e6f67859 | |
| parent | 0a59d8631e2acb20601e72c6f79d7ce193633844 (diff) | |
| download | standingwithresilience-3e65ec890f0bc9e9bec8ffd64e69ccf87ed6054e.tar.gz standingwithresilience-3e65ec890f0bc9e9bec8ffd64e69ccf87ed6054e.zip | |
clang fix
| -rw-r--r-- | research/choice.txt | 34 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | starts/meaning-vm/makefile | 2 |
2 files changed, 35 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/research/choice.txt b/research/choice.txt index 2a09df9..aa6b2d7 100644 --- a/research/choice.txt +++ b/research/choice.txt @@ -11,6 +11,40 @@ with personal judgement-making. when coding we worry about maintainability, difficulty, speed, effectiveness. a general decision-making process may multiply value/importance by effectiveness and pick the greatest. +note: choicemaking involves learning. + we're going to produce information after making a choice + to inform future choices + useful metrics: + how-long-took + success log surrounding + event log surrounding + choices never followed by immediate success could + be unwise to consider first in an emergency. + useful goal attributes: + time available, time preference + importance + experience + decider that selected this goal + expected attributes for meeting it + ease + time + space + (look like needs) + acceptable attributes for meeting it + seems valuable to reconsider the behavior if the + attributes for meeting it leave what is acceptable + hrm .. example is in different area. + choice has a lot to do with expectations. + the metrics seem like they could relate a lot + to future state +this is very similar to people working together. learning +appears to be a dialogue of reasons. it is helpful to consider a +decider a person who can be asked or updated things. + needs appear labels for resources discovered as + helpful metrics in reaching goals. + propose we talk about people / judgement processes, and + needs, rather than reasons. + # worry: this research may not close. it could inhibit associated things. # reason to continue is because it may inform other decisions. # do you know it won't close? any concept around how much? diff --git a/starts/meaning-vm/makefile b/starts/meaning-vm/makefile index 4933f1d..5833e57 100644 --- a/starts/meaning-vm/makefile +++ b/starts/meaning-vm/makefile @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Please support Karl working on this intelligence framework. The framework needs to be quality, so that the rest may function. -CXXFLAGS=-pedantic -Wall -Werror -Wno-error=deprecated-declarations -std=gnu++17 -fno-operator-names -ggdb -O0 +CXXFLAGS=-pedantic -Wall -Werror -Wno-error=deprecated-declarations -Wno-gnu-zero-variadic-macro-arguments -std=gnu++17 -fno-operator-names -ggdb -O0 LINK.o=$(LINK.cc) all: level0 level1 habit-starts/rhythm |