move intellect-framework-from-internet into folder

1 files changed, 84 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/intellect-framework-from-internet/starts/biscuit/biscuit.c b/intellect-framework-from-internet/starts/biscuit/biscuit.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bc5cbef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/intellect-framework-from-internet/starts/biscuit/biscuit.c
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+// This biscuit is unlikely to work, but is fun to build.
+// Intended behvaior is to support moving towards all needs being met of all influences, without compromise.
+
+// Request: please prove will not destroy life as known within 0.001 likelihood.
+// Request: metaboss clearly made biscuit happen. not karl's alone. collective people played largest role
+
+
+// 3 programs that share code, output, and input, interwoven possibly dynamically, maybe only some forms
+// 	I think plan was the output is numbers or code,
+// 	                 the input is numbers or code,
+// 	                 and code maps the numbers and code together.
+// 	                 numbers are references to code
+
+// core: we want to rereference existing code, so we may want an outline program that then stitches
+// together inner components.
+// note: outline can be made of components too
+// so, reasonable components are header, body, and footer.  maybe more.
+// we'll want to #include the different components, I suppose
+// probably reference them with some kind of number token and expand.
+//
+// Let's start with a random core.
+//
+// phases:
+// - execution
+// - mutation
+// - optimization
+// - selection
+//
+// important inputs:
+// - randomness
+// - time
+// - environment
+// - self
+// - human
+//
+
+// goal: make an impossible biscuit without using thought.
+
+// steps:
+// 1. collect relevent information
+// 	- [ ] document above
+// 	- [ ] document on blockchain
+// 	- [ ] code on other harddrive
+// 	- [ ] deleted files on drive?
+// 2. code
+// 3. review
+// 4. run & test
+//
+// maybe make a sandbox wrapper first
+// it will launch three, randomly connect inputs, outputs and code, and compare with errors
+// then it will pick of the combinations the valid values closest to the average
+// and repeat
+// --> must preserve output.
+// 	output preserving -> when we mutate, we want to reference surrounding parts.
+// 	that'll mean splitting the document  Isuppose.
+// 	we'll have document maps that reference the original document
+// 	_or_ we can just have it learn to shrink itself ...
+//
+// let's just plug in behaviors until we have something that runs
+// and then verify it won't destroy anything
+//
+// Need: "I feel crummy cause I need to make sure I get credit
+// Metaneed: "I have a metaneed atm; could we pretend we're talking about a dog and move on?"
+
+// intertwine: environment, behavior, output
+// to pass, can label 1, 2, 3 for which, and # for value
+// record behavior? how?
+// - could step with gdb, record line number
+// -> can use tracer to store, maybe gprof?
+//
+// in advance we plan which one to compare with
+//
+// MUST BE RAISED IN A GRADUALLY GROWING CONSTRAINED ENVIRONMENT USING HUMAN INPUT
+// 	-> the solution to this could start as treating failure as trauma, and asking for
+// 	   help when it is not understood.
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+	// environment: other running details
+	printf("%d", random());
+	// we recall we used numbers to think with
+	// each number mapped to a computer program chunk
+	// one of them collects them together, compiles them, and executes them
+}