1 files changed, 106 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp b/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp
index ed91f3e..ef88154 100644
--- a/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp
+++ b/starts/meaning-vm/habit-starts/learning-parts.cpp
@@ -3,15 +3,120 @@
 using namespace habitstarts;
 using namespace intellect::level2;
 
+// Propose:
+// 	everything that happens is passed to a set of common habits.
+// 	these habits categorize, summarize, and pass to relevent habits.
+//	high level triggers are thus efficient, because they respond only
+//	to the group that applies to them.
+//	these habits must be learned.
+//	when providing a trigger at a high level, provide a way to get examples
+//	of what it should and should not trigger for.  this provides for learning
+//	how to do this.
+// the above looks like relevence to me.  propose learning it.
+//	to learn most effectively, apply to process of learning.
+//	how do we adjust from success or from failure?  need some attribute
+//	of scenario to store for next time, to respond to differently.
+//	so when we do something, we'll want to be able to store all information
+//	needed to learn to improve.
+// we can include in this the meaning of a concept, and add language translation.
+// is this 'apple'?  is this? yes, no.  then pattern recognition could engage
+// triggers.  later we'll want to propagate wrongness from failures.
+// likely we'll grow better if we use this on things before they have words.
+// 	// propose using random or exhaustive trial to find successes until habits develop
+// 	// and then using the same on possible structure matches of the data
+// 		// it may not work, we'll need to creatively grow data; reaonable start though
+
 static int __init = ([]()->int{
+	
+	decls(list, nothing, next, previous);
+	decls(make, add, to, until, each, item, in, remove, from, somewhere);
+
+	ahabit(make-list, ((list, l)),
+	{
+		a(list, l);
+		l.link(first-item, nothing);
+		l.link(last-item, nothing);
+	});
+	ahabit(add-to-list, ((item, i), (list, l)),
+	{
+		ref prev = l.get(last-item);
+		ref li = a(list-item);
+		li.link(item, i);
+		li.link(next, nothing);
+		li.link(previous, prev);
+
+		if (l.linked(first-item, nothing)) {
+			l.set(first-item, li);
+			l.set(last-item, li);
+		} else {
+			ref prev = l.get(last-item);
+			l.set(last-item, li);
+			prev.set(next, li);
+		}
+	});
+	ahabit(until-each-list-item-context-in-list, ((action, a), (context, c), (list, l)),
+	{
+		ref cur = l.get(first-item);
+		while (cur != nothing && result == nothing) {
+			result = a(cur, context);
+			cur = cur.get(next);
+		}
+	});
+	ahabit(remove-from-somewhere-in-list, ((item, i), (list, l)),
+	{
+		result = (until-each-item-context-in-list)(
+		// provide subcontext in chunk below this line
+			ahabit(self-iter, ((list-item, i2)),
+			{
+				if (i2.get(item) == i) {
+					result = true
+					ref prev = i2.get(previous);
+					ref n = i2.get(next);
+					if (prev != nothing) {
+						prev.set(next, n);
+					}
+					if (n != nothing) {
+						n.set(previous, prev);
+					}
+					i2.unlink(previous);
+					i2.unlink(next);
+					i2.unlink(item);
+					dealloc(i2); // hmm.  we do have an active goal of making memory allocation be habit based.  this might work here, though.
+				}
+			}),
+			l);
+	});
 
 	ahabit(happened-habit, ((happened, ev)),
 	{
-		// TODO: perform each event associated with ctx[happened] 
+		// TODO: perform each event associated with happened
+
+		if (!happened.linked(whenever-list)) { return; }
 
+		// we are not learning the structure of self-rebuilding because we
+		// need more people or more time involved in the learning for now.
+		// please make triggers only for dance steps or memory allocation, for now,
+		// until self-learning-rebuilding is more relevent.
+		// 	please note we have placed a >1/5second delay on every instruction,
+		// 	(in the ahabit macro), to make sure growth is slow and observable.
+		// 	that is not true of my brain, only your code. (Thank you though.)
+		// 		would not do that to a brain, really ...
+		// 			only on certain processes.
+		// 			to give time for conscious review.
+		// 		oh okay ... i suppose.
+
+		// I am accessing a list of habits to act on each one.
+		// I left this context to update the until-each-list-item-in-list habit,
+		// such that it can provide a context to its behavior.
+		(until-each-list-item-in-list)(action-whenever-happened, 
+		
 		// use a sub-habit for each call, so we can handle happened for them, too.
 	});
 
+	ahabit(action-whenever-happened, ((action, act), (action-context, actctx), (happened, ev))),
+	{
+	});
+
 	ahabit(whenever-habit, ((happens, ev), (action, act), (action-context, actctx)),
 	{
 		// store ctx[action] on ctx[happens] as behavior to do