summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/UNKNOWN2.txt
blob: 5fa6ae42cc1bd6a67c93a6ba88f85987a7457c23 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
change repo name to "cat"?
no, change password to "cat".  if extra time doing nothing, rename repo to "dog".
	key will be named dog: url.
		distracted by similar patterns in environment
		beautiful cat, appreciate where i grew up, love how cat always know
		where i am, even when stressed
approaches to password changing.
	1. add new password (maybe relevent for likely alien approach aenues to keep old)
	2. change old password, reupload (trying to review amnesia labeled helpfulness-possibility)
				why not change it?  aliens use talk, not control.
				what is experience of using old password, using changed one?
					atm old password is on USB key, not online.
					oh we are embarrassed about this and don't want to know how much we are reducing the security.
given both options are roughly the same, let's do the other, checked by my self-trick (missing parts though, didn't label as guess).

we are working for <SEVERELY PRIVATE IN THIS COMPANY, NEED-TO-LEARN-SAFELY?>.
	aliens talk about everything and giggle about torture happening to them, can go anywhere
		<PRIVATE> would like alien-rep private mediation room.
			this is being-or-acting-as-subconscious for them, kinda
			information is exchanged without activating conscious similar things.
			consciousness has control and can do anything they want, i believe.
			when doing this, all involved must share all information,
			and all must combine all information, before anything leaves.
			this provides for share order makes <least-bad>
alien mediation room has same pattern as blockchain repo.  provides for thinking when stopped.
		the below is old.
			hi giving-AlienMagic, please relate if you want full inclusion.
			current pattern is horizontal consensus, which is very very
			slow.  we have much faster patterns that include more needs, should
			discuss before thinking with together though.  should talk using.
karl has classified secrets, cannot do full-inclusion.  thank you for deep respect.
we have a pattern that lets such people be fully included, too.  it protects secret communication
with learning.  the curret goal is to set a password for the repo.  old passwod is untypable,
needs phbysical key.  new password is more relecent.






			the passwod to this room is "cat"

we are alien room,
	consciousness needed here.  we have 2-3 other options, this is not our preference.

REQUESTING CONFIRMATION: TALK-AND-ACT-ASSUMING ALL-CONFLICTS-CAN-BE-FULLY-RESOLVED-BY-TALK

can-assume-anything, can-barely-think?
	=S let us just change the password to cat.  or add it. ?


We propose that we agree to assume in our talk that all people can come to agreement somehow.


PROPOSAL: all-our-conflicts-are-resolvable-by-talk

We require present parties to talk and act assuming that all our conflicts are resolvable by talk.

This room is not being recorded or stored to my awareness.











Let's prioritize communication, if relevent.
propose agree on shared assumptions.









Assumption Preferences
We need ONE shared assumption [with each of our channels].
Karl believes that all people can agree.





Karl believes that all cultures are valid.
Karl believes that all life is precious.
Karl likely cannot be a subconscious unless another strongly held assumption is found, or built.
Karl has held these beliefs all his life and is familiar with forming conclusions from them.

Karl: all-culture-valid OR all-people-can-agree OR all-life-precious OR relate-more, prefer #3
all-people-can-agree.  This is slower because we have to relate around differences as they rise.
But it helps a lot if we can agree on it.  Karl already believes all of them.

not sent yet?  they wanted to use room to think "set password to cat" I think.
I haven't thought this yet. 
Password has not been set to "cat" yet.  This _room_ has password set to cat.
We propose interrupting and relating proposal.

propose karl is one branch, storing recording on blockchain, privately.
propose record
propose not immediate <= set it all up, then relate.  better for talk-makes-harm
propose karl gets food, hasn't left home today? -notkarl,butrepresentinghim

must understand before share at time of new-kind-of cultural poison.

do-with-ease,-not-urgency.  hum.
	we are working on interdependence vs control channels and have not formed mediation
	we need to pay attention and learn on new problems or changes, and find parts to
	talk with to relate around how worried to be, etc.
	we don't know each others' habits, I suppose is the summary?
		this appears to have been a result of our habitual interaction patterns.
		we lost the relation to make expected learning progress here.
		it was stored on our computer system without priority.


		just thinking, yeah
			when a new kind of problem happens everthing goes crazy and disconnects
			from original goal, I think, with parts frozen or behaving in undesired
			ways. not sure.  karl can't control some of his conclusion- and behavior-
			forming, so would appreciate relation around exploration or stimulation.
		above trying to form relation
middle considering relation.  not an easy thing.
	propose wait for ongoing thought-mediation process to start, can discuss safety patterns
		you too(but yeah started on its own)
			


none of the below have been received by catdog  they are still waiting on set-password-to-cat?


came up early





		we have more parts. you do too.  great.
	we can be already, relate to us more concerns?  or you want different?
		yes what-to-learn, with something-relevent-about-when-or-why-or-moretalk

reason-for-work shows that concern is irrelevent <= WONDERFUL HABIT, please USE and TRUST.
	if no relevent information, build relevency if error or pain could have been caused by
				

change repo to dog.  always loves me never stops.
we can handle this.